Some of the most complicated parts of commercial leases are the repairing provisions. These are often misunderstood by first time tenants (and also landlords). Many people are used to the situation in residential leases where a tenant has only limited responsibility for maintenance and repair of the property. A landlord in a residential lease has to keep the property wind and water tight and maintain the property to a reasonably high standard. No such protections exist in commercial leases and it is entirely open to the parties to agree the repairing basis. In most cases, a landlord will be looking for a Full Repairing and Insuring (FRI) Lease. This means that the tenant takes on the entire responsibility for repairing and maintaining the property, irrespective of the condition that the property was in at the outset (although this can be limited in certain situations). A tenant will, in these situations, not merely be responsible for maintenance and repair of the internal parts of the property, but will also be responsible for the outside of the property, including any common parts. A typical high street commercial property, perhaps a shop, will normally have a share of the responsibility for the outside walls of the building, the roof, chimney heads, gutters, downpipes, etc. The typical alternative to an FRI lease is an Internal Repairs Only (IRO) lease where the tenant only has responsibility for internal parts of the property and not any external or common parts. The difficult part here is that these leases do not ever say on them “Full Repairing and Insuring” or “Internal Repairs Only”. There tends to be quite long and technical clauses included which set out the repairing and insuring requirements and it is only through properly understanding those that you will be able to tell what type of lease you are looking at.
Regardless of whether the Lease is FRI or IRO, another thing that often takes tenants by surprise is standard of repair or maintenance required. In the absence of any Schedule of Condition which sets out the condition of the property at the commencement of the lease, a tenant will often be required to maintain and repair a property to a fairly high standard, irrespective of the condition that it was in at the outset. Occasionally a tenant will argue to a landlord that they’ve left the property in the same condition that it was at the outset, but if they have not been properly advised on their lease, they may not understand that they were actually supposed to maintain it to a much higher standard. A landlord can require a tenant to carry out repair and maintenance throughout the lease and on termination of the lease. It is essential therefore that landlords and tenants are properly advised at the outset.
This is not simply a warning to tenants; a landlord will also want to ensure that the correct form of lease has been prepared and given to their tenant, and a tenant will want to know what their responsibilities are. Typically, with an FRI lease, a tenant will need their solicitor to examine the property title so that they can be advised of the property’s share of repair and maintenance costs for the building of which the property forms part, and many tenants will also opt to have a survey carried out so that they can check the condition of the property and the building in advance of signing the lease.